Nikon D3300 vs D3400: Burst shooting (fps)īoth cameras use the same EN-EL14a battery - but battery life is significantly better on the D3400 However, with the D3300, you’ll be able to get far better audio by simply plugging in an external mic, of which there are many options at budgets to suit all. Recording audio from a built-in mic isn’t desirable as these are more prone to picking up the hum caused by the lens’ autofocus motor, as well as other operational sounds.
Interestingly, the one point of difference is actually a massive plus point for the older D3300 this model includes a port for an external microphone, while the newer D3400 lacks this option and can only record audio from the built-in mic.
What’s interesting about the video modes on both cameras is that, despite the difference in age between the two, specifications are almost identical. Keen videographers will know that by using the 60fps option, footage can be altered for a dramatic slow-motion effect. Nikon D3400: Full HD recording up to 60pĮven though the two models are entry-level DSLRs, both cameras are fairly capable in the video department, with Full HD (1080p) video recording possible on both bodies.įootage can be captured at a number of different frame rates, including the standard 24fps rate, the more web-friendly 30fps, and 50/60fps options too.Nikon D3300: Full HD recording up to 60p.If you want to use an external microphone, you'll have to opt for the D3300 (above) as the newer D3400 does not have a mic port built into its body.
0 kommentar(er)
